Chain ha scritto:
Già, un attacchino che potrebbe venire parato dai mox 5/5, o uno sparetto che dovrebbe dire "THIS deals 3 damages to target creature, player OR PLANESWALKER".
Vabbé dai, regà, almeno un paio di regole prima di parlare?
rule 212.9 - Planeswalkers ha scritto:
212.9f - Each planeswalker has a number of activated abilities. A player may play an activated ability of a planeswalker only during a main phase of his or her turn, when he or she has priority and the stack is empty, and only if none of its activated abilities have been played that turn. The cost to play an activated ability of a planeswalker is to put on or remove from that planeswalker a certain number of loyalty counters, as shown by the loyalty symbol in the ability's cost. An ability with a negative loyalty cost can't be played unless the planeswalker has at least that many loyalty counters on it.
212.9g - If noncombat damage would be dealt to a player by a source controlled by an opponent, that opponent may have that source deal that damage to a planeswalker the first player controls instead. This is a redirection effect (see Rule 419.6c) and is subject to the normal rules for ordering replacement effects (see Rule 419.9). The opponent chooses whether to redirect the damage as the redirection effect is applied.
Quindi un tuo Mox non potrà MAI bloccare, perché puoi attivare le abilità di Tezzeret solo a velocità sorcery.
E non serve che lo sparo nomini i Planeswalker come possibili bersagli... Altrimenti sti Planeswalker sarebbero un tantinello difficili da targettare, no?
PinkFish ha scritto:
Zirox ha scritto:
Ma per pura curiosità , non esiste una lista delle persone scoperte a rubare
Sì, hanno appena vinto le elezioni.
Scusate ma non potevo resistere.
[/img]
vabé, si vedrà ^^